Skip to main content

Dance Nation by Clare Barron at Playwrights Horizons

After seeing Clare Barron's new play, Dance Nation, at Playwrights Horizons, I am angry.

I am angry that Playwrights Horizons put something so underdeveloped and half-baked on their stage.

I am angry that this play represents the state of New York theater these days.

I am angry that I won't get those two hours of my life back that I spent suffering through it.

(And now I am angry at the raves it received. But nothing should surprise me anymore.)

It's the kind of play that would make me swear off theater if I wasn't already excited to see The Beast in the Jungle and Torch Song and The Ferryman. And of course, if I wasn't a masochist.

I really don't know what I was expecting from Dance Nation. I was okay with Barron's concept of adults playing the 13 year old girls (it happened in The Wolves and worked beautifully; I wouldn't expect, nor would I want, actual teenagers in this play), and I was even okay with one of them being played by an actress in her 60s. But Barron's note in the program says she didn't want them all to be played by petite 25 year olds. Okay but when I look around the stage, I see the majority of your actresses are thin, young, and attractive. If you're going to have a gimmick, have conviction in it. It's nice that the cast is racially diverse but I want to see body diversity as well. Represent every type of woman on stage. For a play that claims to be feminist, it doesn't have the guts to fully embrace it's own bullshit.

I am also unclear about how we're supposed to interpret these characters. Barron has called it a "ghost play," whatever that is, so I'm not sure whether or not the characters are actually supposed to sound like 13 year olds. Because they don't. I hate to keep comparing this to the vastly superior Sarah DeLappe play The Wolves but DeLappe was able to create characters who acted and sounded like teenage girls. They were relateable. I don't know what kind of 13 year old girl Barron was but those characters didn't act like any of the ones I knew, or the one I was. (I was also memorizing Angels in America and listening to Rufus Wainwright when I was 13 so if anyone wants to write a play about that girl, be my guest.) They don't sound 13. And granted, I haven't been 13 in nearly twenty years and kids are very different these days but what the hell is going on this play? I never knew of any girl who a) would refer to her own vagina as a "pussy" and b) would even acknowledge that she has a perfect pussy.

Okay, if you want to argue with me that this is Barron's way of showing how girls reclaim their bodies and the power over their bodies and how they deal with the emotional bullshit that is being a 13 year old girl (it's really not fun), I'll buy that. But it's done in such a presentational way. Show, don't tell. We get glimpses into these characters but they're not really developed. I want to know more about Connie and her mother on anti-depressants and her toy horses. I want to understand why Ashlee just says "no" to people who tell her she's beautiful, and her messed up sense of power and the politics that come with it. I want to know more about Luke; what's his deal? What is he supposed to represent? Instead Barron just goes for shock value, and relies too much on vulgarity for my tastes. (I'm not a prude but vulgarity is never going to be funny to me. I don't need someone yelling "motherfucker" and "cunt" over and over again.)

(I will say it was nice to have a real period on stage, even if it leads to some eye-rolling moments.)

I don't know what I wanted this play to be. I don't know what I expected it to be either. But whatever it is on stage, I hate it.

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Amy and the Orphans by Lindsey Ferrentino at the Roundabout Theatre Company

There's so much to celebrate about Lindsey Ferrentino's Amy and the Orphans. The play is not only one of the better things of the season but it manages to be funny, entertaining, well-acted, and a major victory for inclusion. Ferrentino's title character has Down Syndrome, and is played by Jamie Brewer, who also has the disease (as does her understudy, Eddie Barbanell. The play becomes Andy and the Orphans when he plays the role.) Amy is never the butt of a joke, never a punch line, and is never exploited, as writers and directors often tend to do when dealing with disabled actors or characters. But of course, that's Ferrentino's intention. Amy has been locked away in group homes (some terrible, some good) her entire life, with limited time spent with her own family. She has had to fend for herself but has developed into a strong individual with likes and dislikes, and even has a boyfriend and a job. Amy has clearly had to overcome a great deal in her life, and...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fireflies by Donja R. Love at the Atlantic Theater Company

Okay, look, I get it, two-handers are tough. You have two characters with which to tell your story, and you have to somehow tell this story with as little exposition as possible. You have to show, not tell. Are you listening, Donja Love? Love's current play, Fireflies , tells the story of a married African American couple in 1963. He's a preacher, traveling the southern part of the country to speak at the funerals of other African Americans who have died due to racial terrorism. (When the play begins, the church bombing that claimed the lives of four little girls in Birmingham has just occurs.) She's a doting and devoted housewife who goes so far as to write her husband's speeches and sermons for him. But what her husband, Charles, doesn't know is that she secretly smokes, she wants to abort the baby she's carrying, and she writes explicit letters to a woman she's in love with whom she only met once, briefly. Oh, and did I mention she, Olivia, has PTSD a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Harry Potter and the Cursed Child at the Lyric Theater

Well, here we are, folks. The last review of the 2017-2018 season. And what a show to go out on. Harry Potter and the Cursed Child is simply an event. The Lyric theater has been renovated for the show, the marquee is bigger than anything we've ever seen in New York (akin to the gorgeous facades we see in London), the merch is plentiful, you can order drinks at your seat through an app, people are walking around in wizard robes. These two plays are unlike anything we've ever seen on Broadway. And in a sense, it seems simply like a cash-grab. We've done the novels, the movies, the theme park, of course there should be a stage show. This is all a part of Harry Potter brand. Quite frankly, it seems very icky when you think about it. Is this what Broadway has come to? And yes, the rumors are true: the script itself isn't the most perfect. It's not that it's not well-written, it just lacks any sense of nuisance that you'd find in strong dramatic writing. Yes, ...
Post a Comment
Read more