Skip to main content

Harry Potter and the Cursed Child at the Lyric Theater

Well, here we are, folks. The last review of the 2017-2018 season. And what a show to go out on.

Harry Potter and the Cursed Child is simply an event. The Lyric theater has been renovated for the show, the marquee is bigger than anything we've ever seen in New York (akin to the gorgeous facades we see in London), the merch is plentiful, you can order drinks at your seat through an app, people are walking around in wizard robes. These two plays are unlike anything we've ever seen on Broadway. And in a sense, it seems simply like a cash-grab. We've done the novels, the movies, the theme park, of course there should be a stage show. This is all a part of Harry Potter brand. Quite frankly, it seems very icky when you think about it. Is this what Broadway has come to?

And yes, the rumors are true: the script itself isn't the most perfect. It's not that it's not well-written, it just lacks any sense of nuisance that you'd find in strong dramatic writing. Yes, okay, it's fair to call it "fan fiction." It's proof that this just an excuse to get more mileage (and money) from beloved characters. But is it a good time at the theater? It sure is.

I am not the biggest Harry Potter fan but I really enjoy the franchise. I've read the books, seen the movies, visited the theme park. I think all of it is a lot of fun and wonderful but please don't ask me about Voldemort's family tree or who the minister of magic is or any sort of details. And I realized my reaction to the plays is the same as the novels: they all start off slow, full of exposition, but when they get to the meat of the conflict, they're so engrossing. You can't put them down. And in the theater, I couldn't help but get so into the second part. I was able to look past the weak script (it's not THAT bad) and enjoy myself. I let the magic and the beautiful effects envelop me and accepted the world of the play. That's all Cursed Child asks you to do.

One of my favorite things about the Harry Potter book series is that it successfully appeals to all ages. That is something to keep in mind when approaching Cursed Child. It has to appeal to all ages as well, and while it does border on children's theater, it is the rare play that is family-friendly.

As I mentioned, the effects are as fun and surprising as you'd think (although sometimes I wish they'd use words instead of effects!) and John Tiffany's direction is flawless. This has expert pacing, and moves like well-oiled machine. Stephen Hoggart's movement and Imogen Heap's score help to develop a great sense of tone. The lighting is beautiful, and sets and costumes are sufficiently elaborate; exactly what we'd expect from a show with a budget that big.

The cast of London imports and New York stage favorites is uniformly excellent, with the standout being Olivier-winner Anthony Boyle as Scorpious Malfoy. He has heavy-lifting to do because he's a character written specifically for the play and I think he is terrific at creating a three-dimensional person that is equal parts funny and heartbreaking. You completely feel for his plight, and he plays the outcast without any sense of cliche. It's a wonderful Broadway debut, and I can't wait to see what else this young actor has in store for him.

Is Harry Potter and the Cursed Child the best play you'll ever see? No. But accept it as the spectacle event that it is and you'll find it's enjoyable. It'll win Best Play the Tonys, and honestly, when you look at the competition, it truly deserves it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fireflies by Donja R. Love at the Atlantic Theater Company

Okay, look, I get it, two-handers are tough. You have two characters with which to tell your story, and you have to somehow tell this story with as little exposition as possible. You have to show, not tell. Are you listening, Donja Love? Love's current play, Fireflies , tells the story of a married African American couple in 1963. He's a preacher, traveling the southern part of the country to speak at the funerals of other African Americans who have died due to racial terrorism. (When the play begins, the church bombing that claimed the lives of four little girls in Birmingham has just occurs.) She's a doting and devoted housewife who goes so far as to write her husband's speeches and sermons for him. But what her husband, Charles, doesn't know is that she secretly smokes, she wants to abort the baby she's carrying, and she writes explicit letters to a woman she's in love with whom she only met once, briefly. Oh, and did I mention she, Olivia, has PTSD a...

I Was Most Alive With You by Craig Lucas at Playwrights Horizons

There's something incredibly exciting (for me) about going to a show at Playwrights Horizons. I don't know what it is--maybe it's because two of my favorite theater-going experiences ever were there, Mr. Burns and The Christians, and every time I enter those doors on 42nd street, I think, "will this be another play just like those great ones?" Sadly, they rarely tend to be these days (although, for all their faults, I enjoyed Mankind and Log Cabin .) And for as ambitious as Craig Lucas' new play,  I Was Most Alive With You is, I can't help but say, "c'mon, Craig, less is more." Lucas sets out to write a play loosely based on the Book of Job, highlighting one man's suffering. This man, Ash, who is Jewish, is a successful TV writer (apparently the writer of the longest-running show of all time? No, he's not Matt Groening) who is a recovering addict and let's not forget, did time for domestic abuse. (His Gentile wife, Pleasant, ...

Yerma by Simon Stone at the Park Avenue Armory

Simon Stone's new adaptation of Lorca's Yerma now playing at the Park Avenue Armory is one of the most interesting productions I've ever seen. Stone, who also directs, has created a unique vision and staging, and gets terrific performances by his cast (especially Billie Piper). Unfortunately his own adaptation lets the production down. Yerma has a simple plot: a woman wants to have a child, and the obsession over conceiving one completely takes over her life and ruins it. The Lorca original makes this a community and social issue; it is the woman's duty to provide her husband with an heir, and if she cannot, she will be ostracized by society. Stone's version has set it in the twenty-first century, a time during which is it not out of the ordinary for women to remain childless. Of course, some stigma still exists around women not becoming mothers (whether by choice or otherwise), no matter how much we tell ourselves that women have the choice to do whatever they wa...